Home Legal News Magistrate Grants Bail To ‘Pinjra Tod’ Activists Saying They Were Merely Protesting; Remands Them In Another Case

Magistrate Grants Bail To ‘Pinjra Tod’ Activists Saying They Were Merely Protesting; Remands Them In Another Case

by Shreya
Pinjra tod

Bail granted to “Pinjra Tod”activists which was founded in 2015 by, started as a movement against curfews in girls hostels and gradually emerged as a collective taking up causes related to women’s emancipation. Kalita ,an MPhil student at JNU’s Centre for Women’s Studies and Narwal, a PhD student at the Centre for Historical Studies, are its founding members.

Also Read: Register as Covid-19 Warriors, download Aarogya Setu, donate to PM CARES as conditions for bail/ anticipatory bail: Madhya Pradesh HC

Two members of the women’s collective ‘Pinjra Tod’, Devangana Kalita (30) and Natasha Narwal (32), who were arrested by Delhi Police on Saturday (May 23) in relation to Jafrabad protests against CAA/NRC in February, were granted bail by the Duty Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) after a special hearing at Mandoli Jail on Sunday (May 24).

Projectvala assignment service updated

They were also remanded to 2 days’ custody of the Delhi Police Crime Branch in another FIR lodged in relation to riots that erupted in North East Delhi on February 24.

pinjra tod activists
Narwal and Kalita

The two women who were granted bail were first arrested in relation to FIR No. 48/2020 registered by Jafrabad police for offences under IPC sections such as 186 (obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions), 341(wrongful restraint), and 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty).

The Duty Magistrate, Ajeet Narayan, noted that the only non-bailable offence in the FIR was Section 353 IPC, which was not prima facie attracted.

Duty Magistrate, Ajeet Narayan
Duty Magistrate, Ajeet Narayan

He also observed that the accused were merely protesting against the NRC and CAA without violence, and have strong roots in the society and are well educated while highlighting the bail matter.

“Facts of the case reveal that accused were merely protesting against the NRC and CAA and accused did not indulge into any violence. Also, the accused have strong roots in society and they are well educated. Accused are ready to cooperate with the Police regarding the investigation”.

Advocates Adit Pujari and Tusharika Mattoo, appearing for the women, opposed the custody application stating that accused had been implicated in the second FIR “malafidely”. It was pointed out that there was no justification for arrest, given the nature of the offences alleged against them, and that too at a time when attempts were being made to decongest jails across the country on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Police alleged that the two women were part of the anti-CAA sit-in protest held under Jafrabad Metro station on February 22-23. BJP leader Kapil Mishra had publicly stated that his followers will clear the protesters if the police did not act. Riots broke out in the region a day later.


Considering that the investigation in this case was in its initial stages, the Judge directed their custody to be given to the Crime Branch for two days before bail.

It was further ordered that their medical examination would be conducted as per rules, and that Narwal and Kalita would be produced before concerned Court again on Tuesday, May 26.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

× Chat with us on WhatsApp