The Chhattisgarh High Court on 11 June granted interim relief to BJP’s national spokesperson Sambit Patra and directed the state Police to not take any “coercive action” against Patra for allegedly promoting enmity between different groups.
Seeking quashing of the two FIRs registered against him for the alleged offences of defamation, promoting enmity between groups and hurting religious sentiments, Patra had moved the High Court.
ALSO READ- ‘State should not be impulsive like an ordinary citizen in defamation matters and invoke Sec 199(2) CrPC to throttle democracy’ :Madras HC Quashes defamation cases against N Ram &Ors
Last month at Civil Lines Police station in Raipur district and Bhilai Nagar police station in Durg district, the FIRs were lodged against himalleging for making false accusations via his personal Twitter account, against former Prime Ministers, Jawaharlal Nehru and Rajiv Gandhi, over the Kashmir issue, 1984 anti-Sikh riots and the Bofors scam.
Notices have been issued by the single-Judge bench of Justice Sanjay K Agrawal to the Respondents seeking their counter affidavits within 4 weeks and until the next date of hearing granted interim relief to Patra by restraining the state Police from taking any coercive action against Sambit Patra.
The FIR registered under Sections 499, 500 & 501 of IPC (for Defamation) could not be taken cognizance of on the basis of police report (in view of Section 199(1) CrPC) and that a written complaint had to be filed before the jurisdictional Magistrate and therefore, the FIR is prima facie barred, ContendedPatra’s counsel Senior Advocate Ajay Barman.
The offences contained under Sections 153A, 298 & 505(2) of IPC in the other FIR were not at all attracted and a bare perusal of the FIR would indicate that ingredients of the aforesaid offences were not made out against him, contented the Counsel.
Sambit Patra was diagnosed earlier for Corona Virus and had been quarantined for 14 days.
“Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and further considering the contention of the petitioner that the petitioner is a patient of COVID-19 and has recently been discharged from hospital and is undergoing quarantine for 14 days, and in view of the provision contained in Section 199 (1) of the CrPC, it would be expedient to direct that till the next date of hearing, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner pursuant to FIR under Crime No. 192/2020 registered against the petitioner… for offences punishable under Sections 499, 500, 501 and 505 (1) of the IPC; and FIR under Crime No. 200/2020… for offence punishable under Sections 153A, 298 and 505 (2) of the IPC ” the courtordered and granted interim relief in view of submissions.
After four weeks, the matter will be taken in the case of Sambit Patra.
Advocates Awadhesh Singh, Ramakant Mishra and Sharad Mishra represented Patra. For the State, Additional Advocate General Sunil Otwani, appeared.
Read the Order: