Home Legal News [Patanjali] Temporary Restrain on APN Live From Airing Defamatory Content Against Patanjali Ayurved : Delhi HC

[Patanjali] Temporary Restrain on APN Live From Airing Defamatory Content Against Patanjali Ayurved : Delhi HC

by Shreya
Patanjali Ayurved

Delhi High Court has temporarily restrained APN Live news channel from airing allegedly defamatory content against Baba Ramdev’s Patanjali Ayurved Limited.

While asking the defendants to take down the URLs provided by the Plaintiff, the Single Bench of Justice V Kameswar Rao observed that the plaintiffs have made out a prima-facie case and even the balance of convenience is in their favour.

Justice V Rao
Justice V Kameswar Rao

Senior Advocate Darpan Wadhwa, who appeared for the plaintiff Patanjali , submitted that the plaintiff got to know about the defendants airing/broadcasting allegedly defamatory and malicious content against the plaintiff on their news channels, which included grave allegations insinuating that the plaintiff sold off Red-Sander Wood against the interests of the country.

Also Read: Supreme Court reserves its order for plea of Arnab Goswami seeking quashing of FIRs filed against him

Mr Wadhwa further argued that the said news being still freely available in the public domain and is creating false aspersions against the reputation of the plaintiff(Patanjali).

It was also submitted by the plaintiff that under Rule 3(2)(b) of the Information Technology (Intermediaries) Guidelines Rules, 2011, the defendant Nos. 2 to 4 as intermediaries are obligated to observe certain due diligence while discharging their duties, but they have allegedly failed to do so.

Mr Wadhwa also cited the judgement of this court in Swami Ramdev & Anr. vs. Facebook, Inc. & Ors. wherein it was held that this Court can grant injunction at the global level provided, the material has been uploaded from India.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal , appearing from Whatsapp argued that there are no allegations in the plaint of any identified / unlawful content circulated on WhatsApp.

While taking these submissions into consideration, the court directed Facebook and YouTube to take down URLs submitted by the plaintiffs, which according to them, were circulating malicious and defamatory content against them.

Read the order here:

Related Articles

1 comment

Utkarsh June 2, 2020 - 12:30 pm



Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

× Chat with us on WhatsApp