Home Legal News Plea Against UGC Directive to Take Final Year Exams By 30th Sept In Karnataka HC; No Rationality in Differentiation in the Mode of Assessment Of Final Year Students and Intermediate Semester Students

Plea Against UGC Directive to Take Final Year Exams By 30th Sept In Karnataka HC; No Rationality in Differentiation in the Mode of Assessment Of Final Year Students and Intermediate Semester Students

by Preeti Dhoundiyal
UGC End Exams


The Karnataka High Court have been moved by Students of the Bangalore Institute of Technology the challenging the UGC Guidelines which made it mandatory for universities to conduct their final year exams by September 30.

The students seek to be promoted in accordance with the alternate evaluation scheme offered to theintermediate semester students and therefore demand cancellation of final year exams.

Vide notification dated July 6, 2020,the Union Ministry of Home Affairs had permitted the conduct of exams by Universities and Institutions and ordered the Universities to compulsorily conduct examination of final year students as per UGC guidelines and Standard Operating Procedure for final year exams.

UGC in furtherance issued revised guidelines for University examination for terminal semester students whereby it instructed Universities to conduct exams in offline (pen & paper)/ online/ blended (offline + online) mode.

Advertisements
Projectvala assignment service updated

ALSO READ- Students’ Union Of Campus Law Centre, Delhi Write An Open Letter To Judges/Admin Against Delhi University Online Open Book Exams

The students have challenged the same on the following grounds:

1) Petitioners’ access to education was adversely impacted due to lockdown

They have submitted that a substantial portion of their syllabus, nearly 70% has remained incomplete as their University “barely held” any classes in the online mode and for a few subjects no online classes had been held at all for final year exams.

“It is evident that the prescribed syllabus in respect of the final semester has not been taught to the Petitioners in a satisfactory manner and in any case not in a manner that would equip them to face an examination on the basis of the same”

It is further contended that even those classes that were conducted online, were contingent upon (i) students’ access to internet and technological infrastructure and (ii) the teacher’s comfort with the technological equipment.

Advertisements

“Even assuming that the individual teachers are all comfortable and well versed with these developments, the access to these classes would still be contingent on the access to internet which is not within the wherewithal of every student. The Petitioners themselves have faced difficulty in accessing the internet from their respective homes,” the plea states.

2) No rational basis to differentiate in the mode of assessment of final year students as against intermediate semester students

It is contended that the stipulation made by the UGC for mandatorily conducting final year exams for terminal semester students while exempting the students who are in intermediate semester and allowing a different scheme of evaluation them, is antithetical to the principle of equality guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution.

It is submitted that the Commission has proceeded on a “false notion” that conducting examination only for final year students is necessary for “reflection of competence, performance & credibility which is necessary for global acceptance.”

The Petitioners have argued that Final year Exams alone do not determine the value and integrity of the degree. Rather, it is a combined effort & performance of a student over the past semesters.

“There is no rational nexus basis for the said classification and the object that sought to be achieved by imposing such varying methods of grading the students in the intermediate semester and the final semester.”

3) Threat of exposure to Covid infection

The students have pointed out that to appear for the final year exams, students will be forced to move of their houses, in some cases even travel across cities and rent accommodations.

This, the Petitioners fear, will pose a huge risk to the students as well as other stakeholders such as invigilators, examiners, etc.

The plea states, “A majority of the universities/Institutions are situated in metropolitan cities which are presently witnessing high incidence of COVID-19 positive cases and the rising trends suggest a further escalation. The travel of students into these areas further exposes them to significantly high risk of contracting and spreading the virus.”

Contention in the Plea

“The mandate to complete the Final Semester examination by end of September 2020 would indisputably expose the students, staff and other stakeholders to a severe health risk and without due regard to requirement of travel, accommodation and safety of such students is in violation of their rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. Furthermore, if such Final Semester examination is postponed on account of lockdown or the impeding spread of the Virus, the students would be in a limbo which would completely hamper their employment and academic prospects.”

ALSO READ- Supreme Court seeks UGC response in the matter of Conducting of final year university exams

The urge that the final year students be evaluated on past performance and be promoted in terms of the alternate evaluation scheme at par with the intermediate semester students must be heard.

Before the Supreme Court, the matter is already under consideration.

On 27th July 2020, Before the Supreme Court, four petitions were listed to quash the Ministry of Human Resources Development’s notification on July 6  and the subsequent UGC Guidelines mandating conduct of examinations for final year students by September 30.

The UGC was demanded to allow individual state governments to pass the final year students based on the candidate’s past performance by the petitioner.

Direction by a bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy & BR Gavai to the Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta was given to file a common reply for the Commission to the petitions By July 29.

Pune-based professor filing an intervention application in the matter argued that as the Commission has permitted conducting of online exams, hencethe impugned UGC guidelines do not violate the fundamental rights of the students and there is no risk to the life of the students, staff and other members of the society.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

× Chat with us on WhatsApp