Home Legal News [Essential Services by lawyers] Two Separate Benches Of Bombay HC Issue Notice To State, Centre & BC on Lawyers Seeking Declaration Of Services Rendered By Them As Essential Service

[Essential Services by lawyers] Two Separate Benches Of Bombay HC Issue Notice To State, Centre & BC on Lawyers Seeking Declaration Of Services Rendered By Them As Essential Service

by Shreya
Bombay High Court
Two separate benches of the Bombay High Court on Tuesday issued notices to State, Centre and Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa in two separate proceedings by lawyers seeking the same relief, declaration of services rendered by lawyers as an essential service.

The bench of Justice AA Sayed and Justice MS Karnik was hearing a PIL filed by Advocate Chirag Chanani and others, the division bench of Justices SS Shinde and Madhav Jamdar heard the writ petition filed by Advocate Imran Shaikh.

Advocate Shyam Dewani submitted on behalf of the petitioners that a large number of advocates live in the suburbs and it was almost impossible to attend Courts without local train services. Whereas, GP Poornima Kantharia argued that Courts are functioning through video conferencing and even the court staff is not allowed to travel in locals. She contended that lawyers can make their own arrangements for travel like moving in private vehicles.

Also Read: [Trademark Case] : Bombay HC Grants Interim Relief To HUL Against Emami for Use of ‘Glow & Handsome’

Advertisements
Projectvala assignment service updated

Advocate Karim Pathan appeared on behalf of the petitioner and APP VB Konde Deshmukh for the State.

Justice Sayed directed the State and Centre to file a reply in the case and adjourned the hearing for two weeks.

Whereas, it was contended in the writ petition that the petitioner Advocate Imran Shaikh that on June 29, he was appearing in a bail application filed before the Metropolitan Magistrate at Esplanade court and so he left home on his friend’s motorcycle but was stopped by the police on the Western Express Highway. Despite the petitioner showing his advocate ID and telling them about his appearance before the Esplanade Court, the cops did not listen to him and charged a challan of Rs.500.

The petition stated-

“The petitioner was on his way to provide legal services seeking justice for his old age, ailing undertrial client and he had to face arbitrariness of the traffic police and embarrassment.

The petitioner is not questioning the good intentions of the government, the grievance of the petitioner is limited to the point that lawyers may be included in essential services so that the justice delivery system can smoothly function.”

Justice SS Shinde issued notice to the State and the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa and posted the matter for hearing on July 10.

Advertisements

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

× Chat with us on WhatsApp