Home Legal News [Vikas Dubey Encounter] Scrap BS Chauhan- Led Inquiry Commission for Having Links with Ruling Party: Plea in SC

[Vikas Dubey Encounter] Scrap BS Chauhan- Led Inquiry Commission for Having Links with Ruling Party: Plea in SC

by Preeti Dhoundiyal
Vikas Dubey encounter

In the Supreme Court, a plea in Vikas Dubey Encounter Case has been preferred by Advocate Ghanshyam seeking directions and issuance of contempt proceedings against state functionaries for allegedly suppressing true facts about the members of the commission in a way to scrap the inquiry commission constituted by the Supreme Court.

A fresh application alleging “fraud of high magnitude” practiced upon the Court by Advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay to all stakeholders responsible for appointing Justice BS Chauhan, Shri Shashikant Aggarwal, Shri KL Gupta and Shri Ravindar Gaur on the judicial commission has been filed.

advocate ghanshaym
Advocate Ghanshaym

Recent facts have come to Upadhyay which cast aspersions on the independence of the members so appointed and he tried to bring those to notice.

He alleged close connections of Justice BS Chauhan with the ruling BJP Government based on an article published in ‘The Wire’ titled ‘Family Ties of Former DGP, SC Judge Cast Conflict of Interest Shadow on Vikas Dubey Probe’ 


Upadhyay’s plea stated, “…two immediate/close relatives of Justice (Retd.) B.S.Chauhan viz. his brother and ‘samadhi’ being legislators with Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) which runs the government in Uttar Pradesh.” 

Projectvala assignment service updated

ALSO READ- Plea for Reconstitution of Inquiry Commission in Vikas Dubey Encounter Case in the SC On Grounds of Bias

The petition puts forth that Shri KL Gupta is related with the IG of Kanpur Zone, Shri Mohit Agarwal, where the alleged encounter of Vikas Dubey took place. “Shri K.L. Gupta is related with IG, Kanpur Zone, Shri Mohit Agarwal, where the alleged encounter of Vikas Dubey took place and who is alleged to be involved in fake encounters and thus, is bound to come under the scanner of enquiry/probe”

Contention in the Vikas Dubey’s Plea by Advocate Ghanshaym

The plea notes that “aforesaid two members of Judicial Commissions are disqualified from being part of the commission on account of conflict of interest and bias or likelihood of bias on their part”.

The Apex Court needs to view the conduct of the State and its functionaries of concealing “vital material facts which go to the very root of the matter” seriously.

It is discernible that the aforesaid two members are in “active collusion and connivance with the State administration” since BJP is the ruling party in UP and the Chief Minister is alleged to be involved in fake encounters of six accused and appears to have provided all support to UP Government in contesting the issue pertaining to an independent inquiry into Dubey’s killing.


Upadhyay mentioned that Shri Shashikant Agrawal & Ravinder Gaur must also be removed from the commission as the “State administration cannot be trusted anymore” and the Judicial Commission/SIT to be wholly reconstituted afresh by the Court.

ALSO READ- Inquiry Commission to probe Vikas Dubey’s Encounter gets Supreme Court’s Nod

“Since the aforesaid members on account of their conflict of interest and being likely to be biased, are disqualified from being members of the Judicial Commission and that being the case, it is not only desirable but also necessary in the interest of the justice, good conscious, equity and fair play that they are removed from the Judicial Commission/SIT and substituted with persons suggested/named by the Petitioner”

Former Chief Justices of India TS Thakur and RM Lodha, and former Justices Santosh Hegde, Anil R. Dave, Kurian Joseph, Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, MY Eqbal, AK Patnaik, Vikramjit Sen, KS Panicker Radhakrishnan, and HL Gokhale were included in the list given by Upadhyay.

The plea also pondered into the issue of discerning what constitutes bias by stating that the “likelihood of bias” but be paid heed to.

“Appointments of aforesaid persons/members in Judicial Commission/SIT, are against the basic tenets of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and principle of natural justice, which is implicit in Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and thus, ultimately, violation of fundamental rights of the people of the country to have fair and impartial investigation/trial”

Earlier Upadhyay had filed an application seeking removal of K L Gupta from the Commission alleging that he had issued press statements supporting the police version of the encounter and was therefore biased. The SC dismissed that plea that no right minded person would think that he was biased, after considering Gupta’s statements in their entirety on July 28.

On July 22, Acting on a writ petition field by Upadhyay, the SC constituted the committee and appointed former SC judge Justice B S Chauhan as the head.

The Uttar Pradesh government had given the names of the committee members. Apart from Justice B S Chauhan and K L Gupta, Justice Sashi Kant Agarwal, a former judge of the Allahabad High Court is the third member of the commission.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

× Chat with us on WhatsApp