Home Legal News [Roshni Act as Unconstitutional] J& K HC Holds Jammu and Kashmir State Land (Vesting of Ownership to the Occupants) Act 2001 (Roshni Act ) Completely Unconstitutional

[Roshni Act as Unconstitutional] J& K HC Holds Jammu and Kashmir State Land (Vesting of Ownership to the Occupants) Act 2001 (Roshni Act ) Completely Unconstitutional

by Shreya
Jammu and Kashmir High Court Constitutes Artificial Intelligence Committee
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court has held that the Jammu and Kashmir State Land (Vesting of Ownership to the Occupants) Act 2001, [popularly known as Roshni Act] is completely unconstitutional.

 All acts done under Roshni Act or amendments thereunder are also unconstitutional and void ab initio, the court said.

The bench comprising the Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Rajesh Bindal directed CBI Investigation into allegations against Ministers, legislators, bureaucrats, high ranking Government and police officials for having encroached upon public lands and having caused orders passed under the Roshni Act in their favour.

Also Read: J &K HC to Set up an International Arbitration Centre at Srinagar and Jammu

Advertisements
Projectvala assignment service updated

The Jammu and Kashmir State Land (Vesting of Ownership to the Occupants) Act 2001 was enacted in 2001 ‘for vesting of ownership rights to occupants of State Land for purposes of generating funds to finance Power Projects in the State.’ In 2018, the Jammu and Kashmir State Lands (Vesting of Ownership to the Occupants) (Repeal and Savings) Act, 2018 or Roshni Act repealed the said Act, however saving actions done under it. While disposing a PIL filed by Prof. S. K. Bhalla said,

Thus by a legislative act, valuable state land held in public trust by the State could be vested in persons who have trespassed thereon. Is this at all legally permissible? Does the Constitution of India enable such a legislative exercise? So far as State land is concerned, the mandate of the law laid down by the Supreme Court is absolutely clear and the answer to the question is in the negative.


The Roshni Act and the Rules prescribe a mode of dispossession of valuable public property in a most arbitrary manner not known by law. The Act and the Rules are in the teeth of binding law laid down by the Supreme Court. They have been worked most arbitrarily and unfairly is in complete violation of the mandate of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The vesting of several lakhs of kanals of public land to private ownership has resulted in such land not being available for public projects and infrastructure including hospitals, schools, parks etc. As a result, the rights to health, education, a good environment of the residents of Jammu & Kashmir, all of which are essential concomitants of their right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India of the residents are violated.”

The court said that large tracts of State lands vested under the Roshni Act, 2001 and those under encroachment must be retrieved in accordance with law.

“We have prima facie found culpability of Government officials at the highest level enabling encroachment of public lands and permitting their illegal vesting in the hands of private owners. Their culpability has to be investigated.“, the bench said while ordering CBI investigation.

The Court has also directed Revenue Department to compile complete identities of all influential persons (including ministers, legislators, bureaucrats, government officials, police officers, businessmen etc.) their relatives or persons holding benami for them, who have derived benefit under the Roshni Act, 2001/ Roshni Rules 2007 and/or occupy State lands, along with the details of the State land which was in illegal and unauthorized occupation of person(s)/ entities with full identity of encroachers and particulars of the land.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

× Chat with us on WhatsApp